Envisioning to create robust and efficient software (inspired by but not limited to, the UNIX philosophy). A free software (Libre software) activist and deeply grounded by ethics that software should be able to consist of the following policies, namely obtaining a copy of the source (not violating copyright), redistribution of the source or binary either modified or unmodified (this is not a violation of payment for work, rather ensuring the software is secure and respects freedom of both users and enthusiasts, for all of them are commercial use), and convey modified work, satisfied that it does not conflict with or break the original covered work or if it is unnecessary. I'm someone who is driven by principles and standards, but would not mind breaking one (if not both) when problems arise that translate the very principles and standards to be insufficient, or simply if the objective does not align with the source incentive despite the aforementioned principles and standards complied. Personally, Algorithmic thinking and mathematical reasoning occupy the decisions I make, in both work and non-work-related activities alike. My core beliefs are: * A robust system shall presuppose a deep design philosophy constrained by coherent axioms. * Idioms shall be a mutable property, for they need not have convulating contradictions influencing practice of the former definition. * Practice must be predicated by constraints. Practically speaking, my core skills revolve around C and C++ (as I am migrating my work to C++) and I am fond of C++, I am learning to optimize my debugging skills with low level bytes and addresses as one would in C (I find it beatiful to think that C is a derivative of assembly). Since I make Linux based software, I'm keen on using bash instead of python but in order to expose my work in C++, I do sometimes use python.